Signal group chat leak: judge orders Trump administration to preserve all messages from 11-15 March – live

May Be Interested In:Starmer rejects Enoch Powell parallel after ‘island of strangers’ speech


Deportations case judge assigned to Signal leak case orders all group messages must be preserved

James Boasberg, the judge Donald Trump says should be impeached over his handling of court proceedings regarding Trump’s hardline immigration policy, is currently conducting a hearing in a lawsuit filed over “Signalgate.

Trump complained about Boasberg earlier today, posting a long rant in which he called Boasberg’s assignment “disgraceful” and implied it was rigged against him.

“Boasberg, who is the Chief Judge of the DC District Court, seems to be grabbing the ‘Trump Cases’ all to himself, even though it is not supposed to happen that way,” Trump wrote, adding: “The good news is that it probably doesn’t matter, because it is virtually impossible for me to get an Honest Ruling in D.C. Our Nation’s Courts are broken, with New York and D.C. being the most preeminent of all in their Corruption and Radicalism. There must be an immediate investigation of this Rigged System, before it is too late!”

Now, Kyle Cheney of Politico reports that Boasberg felt obliged to begin his Thursday hearing with “a detailed explanation of the random case assignment process, emphasizing that he did not ask for or somehow proactively get this case”.

Boasberg has also “ordered the agencies who participated in the Signalgate chat to preserve all Signal messages between 11-15 March and to provide an update to the court about efforts to do so”.

A reminder, if it could possibly be needed: “Signalgate” refers to a group chat about airstrikes in Yemen, between top national security advisers and containing national security information, to which national security adviser Mike Waltz apparently inadvertently added Jeffery Goldberg, editor of the Atlantic Monthly.

More, from Hugo Lowell:

Share

Updated at 

Key events

Justice department civil rights division investigates Stanford, Berkeley and UCLA to root out ‘DEI discrimination’

Attorney General Pamela Jo Bondi announced on Thursday that she has directed the justice department’s civil rights division to ensure that four California universities – Stanford University, Berkeley, UCLA, and University of California, Irvine – are not using what she called “illegal DEI policies” to select students from diverse backgrounds.

“Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. President & Fellow of Harvard Coll., 600 U.S. 181 (2023), colleges and universities are prohibited from using DEI discrimination in selecting students for admission, and the Department of Justice is demanding compliance” the attorney general’s office said in a statement.

“President Trump and I are dedicated to ending illegal discrimination and restoring merit-based opportunity across the country,” said Bondi.

As we reported last month, a group co-founded by a professor of law at UCLA to fight what he calls the covert use of affirmative action in admissions decisions by colleges in the University of California system filed a lawsuit, aiming for an injunction to prohibit any consideration of race in student admissions.

Share



share Share facebook pinterest whatsapp x print

Similar Content

Full interview: Former Government Ethics Office director discusses being fired by Trump
Full interview: Former Government Ethics Office director discusses being fired by Trump
The Largest Wildfire in World History Burned 15% of a Continent
The Largest Wildfire in World History Burned 15% of a Continent
Yahoo news home
South African politician condemned for visiting fugitive pastor
Ipso logo
Acclaimed action film starring unlikely Breaking Bad star airing on TV
tariffs
Workers blockade Windsor factory trying to ship machinery to U.S.
ASX to open lower after Nvidia weighs on Wall Street
ASX to open lower after Nvidia weighs on Wall Street
Beyond Borders: Global News That Hits Home | © 2025 | Daily News